HIGH PRIESTS OF MORALITY PROTECT THEIR OWN FOUL MOUTHED SPECIMEN
A high priest of morals in the NGO that has no alternatives, has had a major problem on his hands with the man who runs the website, one Hatthotuwa, abusing in foul language a colleague in front of all other staff.
This man (the one who runs the website) known as a pompous, pretentious, holier than thou, bombastic pinhead at the best of times had dozens of complaints against him recently from colleagues as he had abused a Tamil colleague in the presence of other staff, bringing her ethnicity into the tirade in the bargain.
The NGO which makes a regular song and a dance about minority rights usually for ulterior motives, was to a man and a woman in favour of sacking the pipsqueak because this was not just a one word put down, but a sustained foul language attack in which the person at the receiving end was called Tamil w----, (note the pejorative stressing on the ethnicity of the victim.)
But the head of the organization then intervened, as the offender -- ethics and good taste apart -- had been a partner in promoting the NGO's pet hates which are the armed forces, essentially peace loving pro Sri Lankan citizens, etc.,
The man who is known to be an unethical rabble rouser, for example has been known to censor comments on his website except when they are ones that are written by like minded charlatans, in favour of his operation.
Generally the guy is on the make and in the shadow of the boss which makes him a cipher in the organization, not worth anybody's powder and shot.
However, we have to place on record his egregious conduct -- just imagine that a bleeding heart who swears by minority rights -- typically of course for these NGO charlatans -- abuses a colleague in unparliamentary language referring to her ethnicity showing his true colours as a bigot, though one that regularly pays lip service to so called human rights causes for the sake of the baksheesh...
What a fiasco -- boss and subordinate both playing high persists of morality and asking at the drop of a hat that people be removed for minor transgressions, now launching a foul language tirade bringing a subordinate's ethnicity into play as well.
Never mind what they want others to do - this holier-than-thou NGO once wanted the Defence Secretary removed for what they alleged, in an obvious cooked up story, was an intemperate phone call to a journalist. Why is the big man, Paki Saravanamuttu himself, not removing the offender in their staff but moving him laterally within the organization just to avoid the embarrassment?
Or are these high priests of morality preferring to live with the stink when their own partners in crime are concerned?
No comments:
Post a Comment